Stop The Clean Electricity Regulations
Last week, Canada’s Environment Minister, Steven Guilbeault, released the draft Clean Electricity Regulations - otherwise known as the much anticipated, incredibly expensive, and entirely unconstitutional net-zero 2035 electricity generation requirements.
Ottawa is even threatening punitive measures for those who don't comply, with Energy and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson announcing that billions of dollars in tax credits and grants will be tied to a province's plan to reach net-zero.
We’ll cut to the chase - these Clean Electricity Regulations are flat-out unconstitutional.
Electricity generation is an exclusive provincial jurisdiction protected by Section 92A (1)(c) of the Constitution, which states:
"In each province, the legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to ... development, conservation and management of sites and facilities in the province for the generation and production of electrical energy."
Luckily, the Clean Electricity Regulations are a consultative document - meaning the regulations are not finalized.
So, we need to make ourselves heard and be as loud as possible now.
That's why we're launching a new campaign calling on the federal government to back off, respect the Constitution, stop infringing on provincial jurisdiction, and Stop The Clean Electricity Regulations!
Please sign our petition against the CER now, pass this petition on to your friends and family, and we'll be in touch in the coming days with more ways you can help with this campaign.
Showing 8571 comments
How come no one is talking about how much hemp and bamboo products can replace?
How come there is no discussion about the engine that runs on water?
How come so many beneficial technological advancements are allowed to be bought up by big business and hidden away?
How come there are never any discussions about the consistent chemical spraying in our air (the official story is its insurance companies seeding to prevent hail but someone is spraying non stop all year round)?
How come there is nothing mentioned about the glyosphate that is used on all our fields poisoning the food, soil and air?
How come no one talks about the amount of federal funding that goes into weapons that destroy our environment?
How come the conversation is always about making changes that affect the common man and hurt his/her quality of life?