Stop The Clean Electricity Regulations
Last week, Canada’s Environment Minister, Steven Guilbeault, released the draft Clean Electricity Regulations - otherwise known as the much anticipated, incredibly expensive, and entirely unconstitutional net-zero 2035 electricity generation requirements.
Ottawa is even threatening punitive measures for those who don't comply, with Energy and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson announcing that billions of dollars in tax credits and grants will be tied to a province's plan to reach net-zero.
We’ll cut to the chase - these Clean Electricity Regulations are flat-out unconstitutional.
Electricity generation is an exclusive provincial jurisdiction protected by Section 92A (1)(c) of the Constitution, which states:
"In each province, the legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to ... development, conservation and management of sites and facilities in the province for the generation and production of electrical energy."
Luckily, the Clean Electricity Regulations are a consultative document - meaning the regulations are not finalized.
So, we need to make ourselves heard and be as loud as possible now.
That's why we're launching a new campaign calling on the federal government to back off, respect the Constitution, stop infringing on provincial jurisdiction, and Stop The Clean Electricity Regulations!
Please sign our petition against the CER now, pass this petition on to your friends and family, and we'll be in touch in the coming days with more ways you can help with this campaign.
Showing 8568 comments
The so-called “scientific studies” funded by Western governments have created an artificial “97% Consensus” of coerced scientists, considering a one-world government approach orchestrated by the World Economic Forum (WEF) (See https://www.beyondthenarrative.ca/canadian-federal-politician-members-of-the-world-economic-forum/ for Canada and beyond.)
These WEF duly infiltrated governments and Corporations are promoting a sympathetic Narrative aimed at “Great Reset” and “Build Back Better” Mandates. Consider the meaning of “Build Back Better”, apart from being grammatically incorrect, implying that something needed to first be demolished in order to accomplish it being rebuilt.
If unfamiliar, do further research to understand what’s currently being attempted. This is not covered by Mainstream, instead going out of the way to obscure it.